I offer three different lesson lengths: 30, 45, and 60-minute lessons. Every student is different, and I want to honor a student's individual preferences before drawing arbitrary lines in the sand. If your lesson length isn't suiting you, I want to adjust your lesson length to something that feels right for you.
That being said, I have observed some patterns regarding lesson length that I will share:
- Students under 13 years old tend to hold quality focused attention for lessons between 30-45 minutes.
- Beginning students ages 13 and up may find 45-minute lessons hit a certain sweet spot. There is time to touch on concepts that are new to you without feeling rushed while avoiding feeling overwhelmed.
- Intermediate or advanced students ages 13 and up will want 60-minute lessons because the content that we will be covering will require deep discussion, consideration, and practice together.
Just as lessons are personalized for each individual student, practicing habits will vary based on area of study, age, and experience. As a very loose rule of thumb, students' daily practice should match minutes for years of age. If my 10-year-old piano student practices for 10 minutes a day every day between lessons, she will see consistent and rapid growth in ability and understanding. If my 30-year-old voice student practices for 30 minutes a day, he will have properly warmed up his voice using vocal exercises that we have done together during lesson, and maybe he practiced one or two of his pieces during that time. It's okay to not get to all of your assigned repertoire every time you practice. Consistent practice is the most important thing, and once you've sat down to practice, prioritize the quality of your practice over the amount of material you can cover in one sitting.
I am happy to help with audition prep for singers of all ages.
Regarding regularly scheduled voice lessons:
Short answer: probably not.
Longer answer: the voice is made up of muscles that are developing through adulthood. A child's body is not equipped to sing with sophisticated technique. If your young child would like to sing, I recommend learning to read and hear music via piano lessons. These musicianship skills are directly related to singing and will deeply serve them later on.
Absolutely. Although I am trained classically, I do not limit the nature of the repertoire that we explore in lessons. I teach students interested in anything and everything (musical theater, popular music, traditional folk tunes, classical repertoire), and I do not rule anything out.
That being said, I hope you will enter lessons with an open mind and take suggestions of new areas of music to you. It isn't always comfortable, but singing repertoire with which you are completely unfamiliar is an excellent way to improve vocal technique.
I get this question ALL OF THE TIME. I have taught dozens of adults over the years, and the majority of the time, they come to me sheepishly and apologetically. It breaks my heart.
Anyone at any level of experience or age can take voice lessons. Singing is for everyone! Western audiences have become increasingly critical of those who opened their mouths to sing, but it once was a much more accepted part of life, and it can be that way again. People were expected to learn about music to not only appreciate it as an observer, but as a participant.
As you can tell, I feel very passionately that your voice should be heard. I understand and appreciate how vulnerable it can feel to sing for someone, especially a stranger, when even your closest friends and family members may have never heard you sing. I will do everything I can to make you feel comfortable exploring your voice during lessons. I do this in a number of ways, one of which is reframing the way in which we speak and think of our voices. Are you thinking of yourself as a "good" or "bad" singer? How can we use less subjective (and, frankly, non-descript and unhelpful) language and instead become objective observers of our voices? What if we treated our musical journey as a scientific study where only descriptive and technical language was allowed?
If you are inclined to ask the question above, please come study with me.